|
Title: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on March 26, 2012, 04:19:21 pm That's all I have to say...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmGfzt-6i5w&feature=player_embedded Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: ekg on March 27, 2012, 09:43:29 am it takes all kinds doesn't it..
Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on March 27, 2012, 11:26:58 am http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DApjHZq9o7M&feature=player_embedded
Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: ekg on March 27, 2012, 08:53:18 pm ya know.. this belong here in the 'Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake' thread..
the supreme Court today.. the solicitor general's argument for mandating young people buy medical insurance.. Quote GENERAL VERRILLI: That’s the problem, Justice Scalia. That’s — and that’s exactly the experience that the States had that made the imposition of guaranteed-issue and community rating not only be ineffectual but be highly counterproductive. Rates, for example, in New Jersey doubled or tripled, went from 180,000 people covered in this market down to 80,000 people covered in this market. In Kentucky, virtually every insurer left the market. And the reason for that is because when people have that guarantee of — that they can get insurance, they’re going to make that calculation that they won’t get it until they’re sick and they need it, and so the pool of people in the insurance market gets smaller and smaller. The rates you have to charge to cover them get higher and higher. It helps fewer and fewer — insurance covers fewer and fewer people until the system ends. This is not a situation in which you’re conscripting — you’re forcing insurance companies to cover very large numbers of unhealthy people – and Scalia's brilliant retort.. remember, we're talking about medical insurance..for the young, for when they get sick or injured. Quote JUSTICE SCALIA: You could solve that problem by simply not requiring the insurance company to sell it to somebody who has a — a condition that is going to require medical treatment, or at least not — not require them to sell it to him at — at a rate that he sells it to healthy people. But you don’t want to do that. what? let companies sells medical insurance and not force them to supply the medical part? isn't that fraud? and uh, isn't that exactly the problem..? insurance companies just keep the money you pay them for their bonus' instead of for your medical treatment? but hey, Scalia also figures everyone will buy medical insurance, just like he does.. Quote JUSTICE SCALIA: When — when they think they have a substantial risk of incurring high medical bills, they’ll buy insurance, like the rest of us. But – GENERAL VERRILLI: That’s — that’s – JUSTICE SCALIA: — I don’t know why you think that they’re never going to buy it. The rest of US? you, Mr. Scalia, buy GOVERNMENT insurance that is subsidized by the tax payer, to lower cost, while not decreasing the medical treatments!!!! EXACTLY WHAT WE ALL WANT,but you're advocating young people NOT buy insurance and insurance companies NOT cover medical treatments, or if they do, charge much more for them.. the rest of 'us' dont' have the government,tax payer subsidized,low cost,unlimited coverage, medical insurance that you do.. and that's what we're trying to get a scrap of.. the people who think this way, who have guaranteed excellent health care, need to spend a year in the world of those who don't have shit.. if I hear one more retarded remark of "you're not denied basic health care, you can use the ER, or you can bargain with your doctor. They took the Hippocratic oath, they have to treat you" I'm going to go Zimmerman (too soon?) on someone.. NO they don't have to treat you, and you're advocating someone use the ER for a $40 strep throat doctor visit.. which will cost you, not them because they don't have the money, but you $750+ lab and doctors fee's.. brilliant move retard. I seriously wish I had magic to make people live in the world they want to create for others to live in.. grrrr Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on March 28, 2012, 06:35:05 pm ya know.. this belong here in the 'Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake' thread.. the supreme Court today.. the solicitor general's argument for mandating young people buy medical insurance.. and Scalia's brilliant retort.. remember, we're talking about medical insurance..for the young, for when they get sick or injured. what? let companies sells medical insurance and not force them to supply the medical part? isn't that fraud? and uh, isn't that exactly the problem..? insurance companies just keep the money you pay them for their bonus' instead of for your medical treatment? but hey, Scalia also figures everyone will buy medical insurance, just like he does.. The rest of US? you, Mr. Scalia, buy GOVERNMENT insurance that is subsidized by the tax payer, to lower cost, while not decreasing the medical treatments!!!! EXACTLY WHAT WE ALL WANT,but you're advocating young people NOT buy insurance and insurance companies NOT cover medical treatments, or if they do, charge much more for them.. the rest of 'us' dont' have the government,tax payer subsidized,low cost,unlimited coverage, medical insurance that you do.. and that's what we're trying to get a scrap of.. the people who think this way, who have guaranteed excellent health care, need to spend a year in the world of those who don't have shit.. if I hear one more retarded remark of "you're not denied basic health care, you can use the ER, or you can bargain with your doctor. They took the Hippocratic oath, they have to treat you" I'm going to go Zimmerman (too soon?) on someone.. NO they don't have to treat you, and you're advocating someone use the ER for a $40 strep throat doctor visit.. which will cost you, not them because they don't have the money, but you $750+ lab and doctors fee's.. brilliant move retard. I seriously wish I had magic to make people live in the world they want to create for others to live in.. grrrr While the SG had problems yesterday, Scalia is downright stupid. How in the hell did this buffoon ever get on the court? http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/03/28/does_antonin_scalia_know_what_s_in_the_affordable_care_law_.html?tid=sm_tw_button_toolbar Quote There was in a strange moment in today's severability argument at SCOTUS. Justice Antonin Scalia referred to a deal that Sen. Ben Nelson once made, to make a hypothetical point about what could take down the law. "If we struck down nothing in this legislation but the -- what's it called, the Cornhusker kickback, okay, we find that to violate the constitutional proscription of venality, okay?" asked Scalia, talking to Paul Clement. "When we strike that down, it's clear that Congress would not have passed it without that. It was the means of getting the last necessary vote in the Senate. And you are telling us that the whole statute would fall because the Cornhusker kickback is bad. That can't be right." The deal that Scalia was referring to -- legendary in conservative anti-Obamacare circles -- was not a classic "kickback." Nelson negotiated for indefinite, unending Medicaid funding for his state. That ended up as part of the bill that initially passed the U.S. Senate on a 60-40 vote. Here's the rub: It's not actually part of the law. Democrats removed the Nebraska deal in the final tortured negotiations that passed the PPACA in the House. When it got to the Senate again, Democrats only needed 51 votes to pass it; Nelson, who'd gotten the bad press from the deal AND nothing to show for it, glumly voted no. Here's another rub. In early coverage of Scalia's zinger, the fate of the "kickback" is totally left out. It might be because no one in the room pointed out the mistake. Or it might be that Scalia, and lots of other people, have internalized the conservative case against the law. Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: ekg on March 30, 2012, 03:40:47 pm While the SG had problems yesterday, Scalia is downright stupid. How in the hell did this buffoon ever get on the court? http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/03/28/does_antonin_scalia_know_what_s_in_the_affordable_care_law_.html?tid=sm_tw_button_toolbar great, so he's arguing what's not even in the law, but instead what he heard on Fox news.. Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on March 30, 2012, 06:22:05 pm great, so he's arguing what's not even in the law, but instead what he heard on Fox news.. yup Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on March 30, 2012, 06:37:34 pm Quote I know how hard it is to wait. Trust me, I know. However, it is worth the wait in the end when you meet that special someone you are meant to be with for the rest of your life. Abstinence only is the best way to prevent unwanted pregnancy and diseases from spreading. However I’m hip, I know a thing or two about hormones. That’s why you should know that if total abstinence seems unreasonable, you could and should try dry humping. That way no penetration is occurring, sexual urges are being satisfied, and no one has to lose their virginity or become pregnant at an age they aren’t prepared for. I’ve always been an advocate for abstinence only, but in all honesty this is the next best thing Rick Santorum Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on March 30, 2012, 06:40:44 pm I wonder if he thought about all those precious dead future baby sperms in the guy's shorts?
Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: ekg on March 30, 2012, 09:59:43 pm Rick Santorum HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA that should have come with a warning label.. and damn, I just got a 'Bad Teacher' flash-back.. LOL.. Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on March 30, 2012, 10:22:30 pm HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA that should have come with a warning label.. and damn, I just got a 'Bad Teacher' flash-back.. LOL.. I don't know if that's for realzies or not -read it on a blog - but really, is that any more crazy han Bristol Palin advocating abstinenance? Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on March 30, 2012, 10:25:51 pm HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ;D that should have come with a warning label.. and damn, I just got a 'Bad Teacher' flash-back.. LOL.. Justin could dry hump me anyday. Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: ekg on March 31, 2012, 09:03:15 pm Justin could dry hump me anyday. ;D ;D How odd did that have to be tho? They didn't exactly break up on the best of terms and here's he's finally getting hitched to the new chic he dump Diaz for.. Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on April 12, 2012, 06:16:32 pm http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DV1rjf7zdD-M%26feature%3Dplayer_embedded&feature=player_embedded&v=V1rjf7zdD-M&gl=US
Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on April 17, 2012, 05:04:17 pm "If Barack Obama becomes the president in November again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year,”
Shitty singer and nutcase Ted Nugent. Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: Howey on April 17, 2012, 05:40:29 pm http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D06XVt6zEr9E%26feature%3Dplayer_embedded&feature=player_embedded&v=06XVt6zEr9E&gl=US
Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: ekg on April 18, 2012, 09:19:35 am "If Barack Obama becomes the president in November again, I will either be dead or in jail by this time next year,” Shitty singer and nutcase Ted Nugent. He's the perfect example of Fox's false equivalency and hypocrisy.. Teddy's said some pretty shitty things over the last cpl years, but to stay current, lets just go with the false equivalency of Obama's war on women Fox has going on because of that high ranking dem op *rollseyes* with close ties to Obama *rollseyes* and Bill Maher's money that should be given back because he called Sarah Palin stupid.. Fox of course has been having nightly circle jerks on just how bad the dems are to women.. and on how Obama should not only give Maher back his money, but put him in GITMO for being such a chauvinist pig who hates all women.. as for Hilary Rosen? well if they could force Obama to have the secret service take her ovaries they would.. because I mean, when you say a woman has never worked a day in her life, when she hasn't... well you're just the devil who hates women, but if you say Sarah Palin is a stupid bitch.. HA! Then you're a Hollywood liberal.. BUT if you're Ted Nugent, when you say stuff like you will be in jail or dead when Obama is elected again and follow it up with.. Quote "If you can't galvanize and promote and recruit people to vote for Mitt Romney, we're done," Nugent said, at one point adding, "We need to ride into that battlefield and chop their heads off in November. Any questions?" Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/election-2012/ted-nugent-barack-obama-president-november-i-dead-jail-article-1.1062886#ixzz1sOgfaY1n and of course Quote Nugent wielded two machine guns while raging, “Obama, he’s a piece of shit. I told him to suck on my machine gun. Hey Hillary,” he continued. “You might want to ride one of these into the sunset, you worthless bitch.” Nugent summed up his eloquent speech by screaming “freedom!” well then, you're friend of the Hannity show and Fox contributor.. I always liked Teddy... he was just bat-shit crazy enough to be entertaining.. and I don't know of a better 'fuck' song (yeah, not a love song.. a full on fuck-fest song) than Stranglehold.. But Obama turned him, and sooooooooooooooooo many other GOP'ers, bat-shit-fuck-nuts crazy.. Title: Re: Nutty As A Effin Fruitcake Post by: uselesslegs on April 18, 2012, 01:50:52 pm I think, after mulling this over, I've come to the conclusion that it's like the good child, bad child routine...in thought anyway. Republicans took SEVERE umbrage with the accusations levied against Bush during the torture inquires and the "false war", CIA personnel leaks, that try as they might, they couldn't really talk down. It's the stepmom, who consciously or unconsciously gives her biological child the benefit of the doubt...even when the evidence is pretty damning...but will put a foot straight up the ass of her stepson/daughter for any infraction, even the flimsy shit...President Obama. If the bio kids gets into the shit, his bio mom can recognize the infraction but proceeds forgiving'ly...even when new dad calls out the bullshit. Reverse that to her stepson/daughter...and ya gotta rain hellfire! The Bush admin galvanized for 8 years, through less than subtle subtext, that there were two kinds of citizens. Those who were with him (Patriots) and those who weren't (traitors). Laugh if you want, but I saw this mentality in action. I saw it play out quite routinely. You didn't have to imagine it, it was quite accessible. All you had to do was question Bush. Torture, the war, Valerie Plame...and there was something, "not quite right with you." Something...treasonous. Of course Bush wasn't to be held accountable for one stink'in thing...but President Obama? He's responsible, FOR EVERYTHING!...regardless of how lose the connection...or no connection...GUILTY! We've had equally contentious and heated past admins, where voters were divided...ideologies clashed, heavily...so what's different now? Mass media baby. The advent of something so wonderful, so futuristic...INSTANT NEWS!...it's a god damn bane. It's everywhere. Before people can even form an opinion...BAM...we'll tell you how this shit in your brain should be organized and responded too! People ingest it, they feel informed like they've never been before, their spoon fed their anger, their angst, their fear, their righteous indignation. The price is heavy. Because most people AREN'T informed, they're manipulated...and half of these fucks can't even get out the message they've been given. They can't think beyond the message. They can't critically analyze. It's a bunch of fuck ups who feel empowered and they STILL can't communicate beyond their emotion...but they want to be taken seriously GOD DAMNIT! Which brings us to this....To make matters worse, elements within the media know that manipulation, word salad, may STILL be a bit complex for many wishing to digest...so they take it DOWN to the next level...Emotion. These fucks will *inform* you using your fears, anger, anxieties,...I guess happy is in there somewhere, but you'd have a hard god damn time finding examples. Emotions are strong, so powerful. Now you unleash these *emotionally informed* assholes into debate, into discourse...and they're all over the fuckin place...just like their emotions. I'm sad, I'm scared, I'm angry, I'm SHITTING MYSELF ARRRGGGGHHH!...oh look!...A PUPPY, dressed up like Uncle Sam, AWWWWWWW. Thank you mass media, for empowering shit eating horse cunts to "feel" like they're informed and TRUE patriots...fighting valiantly against the mongrel horde seeking the destruction of the United States. Bravo...you just might get another civil war if Obama wins a second term. Pat yourself on the back, you fuckapes. |