|
Title: Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest Post by: FooFa on September 23, 2011, 01:49:45 pm Speed of Light Broken (http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/speed-of-light-broken/) Title: Re: Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest Post by: betteroffhere on September 23, 2011, 04:39:44 pm Speed of Light Broken (http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/speed-of-light-broken/) hmm...proven wrong not completely...a portion...it looks like it ! listen...albert was working with limited information at the time... and did a damn good job for what he had to work with ! he influenced the way we view things....and thats what i'm trying to do with the DNA... of course i shall be wrong in some manners i imagine...but i hope it will cause a new way of thinking about out interaction with everything... causing a domino affect to take place like albert or thomas...or even ben... peace ! Title: Re: Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest Post by: FooFa on September 23, 2011, 06:26:31 pm It's simply new information. I don't have any bone to pick with Einstein. Title: Re: Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest Post by: betteroffhere on September 23, 2011, 07:01:07 pm It's simply new information. I don't have any bone to pick with Einstein. nor do I... it is just what i thought when i seen this story yesterday... and i put my same thoughts to words here... it wasn't to cause a discussion or point out anything else... we're good !...peace ! Title: Re: Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest Post by: Howey on September 23, 2011, 07:03:01 pm It's simply new information. I don't have any bone to pick with Einstein. I think too many folks jumped the gun on this one. Call me when every other word isn't "may". Title: Re: Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest Post by: FooFa on September 24, 2011, 07:29:52 pm The most interesting thing to me about this is that I don't doubt it but I don't believe it could possibly in any way discredit E=mc2. I feel the greater likelihood is that the speed of light would still be the standard since it is more than likely more closely associated with work that involves that formula;that there is a particle or more exceeding that speed would be a useful margin of consideration and new areas for study. What I'm wondering I guess if you understand what I'm suggesting, is, doesn't it make sense? I believe that dualism hinders much advancement in the way the masses think, the sports example. In other words the majesty of the individual is so undermined in all systems of import that the very people who should be jubilant about this discovery are promoting it being poo pooed before it's even been peer reviewed. Title: Re: Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest Post by: betteroffhere on September 25, 2011, 12:43:24 am The most interesting thing to me about this is that I don't doubt it but I don't believe it could possibly in any way discredit E=mc2. I feel the greater likelihood is that the speed of light would still be the standard since it is more than likely more closely associated with work that involves that formula;that there is a particle or more exceeding that speed would be a useful margin of consideration and new areas for study. What I'm wondering I guess if you understand what I'm suggesting, is, doesn't it make sense? I believe that dualism hinders much advancement in the way the masses think, the sports example. In other words the majesty of the individual is so undermined in all systems of import that the very people who should be jubilant about this discovery are promoting it being poo pooed before it's even been peer reviewed. in reference to the second paragraph.... first question...short answer....Yes ! maybe...idk...i'm no fucking scientist for gods sake !!!.... jesus christ... i'm dealing with extremely limited information and education... yo ! light speed is able to reach that rate speed because it has zero mass...or something like that it is a wave of somehow...idk how the fuck it travels or if it really even fucking moves...!!! idk if it just a series of reflections or it actually has demensional features and occupies space in volume or its not demensional but just a continuious series of reflections...that looks like it is moving... what the fuck do i know... if i remember correctly light is a vibrating frequency that is viewable with certain parameters... so...theoretically...other frequencies should be faster than and slower than light... finding them or looking at the question the right way however is the challenge that will lead us to the correct answer one day ! peace ! ... @betteroffhere2 on twitter #iamboh |