I don't think this showed up on unread, I wonder if that works right. I've learned about my personality and the abrupt things I do sometimes related to this. About a decade ago it was heading to F L A on a wing and prayer so i guess I'm making progress. An aspect of this experience reminds me of a quote I mentioned one time from Linda McCartney's father abut how that small group of people couldn't decide whether they loved or hated each other. Things would even out for a while and then some other money issue in their case would get lawsuits started again. I often think of that quote in the original Clerks about hating people but loving social occasions.
I really enjoy hearing from some of the folks again and wish and hope that we will have more discussions. Therein seems to lie part of the dilemma. I believe the R/D differences are such minutia in the long run that most of it is not worth the energy. I think people can change things for the better or at least keep up with documenting the corruption. I have tunnel vision on politics.
Treason is among other things, giving the control of a sovereign country over to a foreign power which in this case begins and ends with the fiat currency system courtesy the Fed which is owned by people like the Rothchilds and the Queen of England and Goldman Sachs. I guess I wish part of the time that I could bring some of that up without it immediately being moved and therefor marginalized and made fodder of.
But honestly it seems difficult to talk about anything without it turning into a football game mentality. Like Lil Mike defended Obama to me on Libya and Howey defended or deflected something I said about Perry;suggesting to me that they were more interested in disagreeing than listening or considering another angle. I don't mean that as a laundry list, just an example of why I see it as difficult to participate.
I very much appreciate the concern
.
