More from the NYT piece.
I'm beginning to understand now. One can run on a racist platform as long as they say they don't want government intervention.
So when his followers start killing the blacks, mo's, and Jews he can say "Yeah...but at least the government wasn't involved!"
sheesh...
So when the right said Barack Obama is supported by the Black Panthers, what was your reaction?
This whole racist angle is full of shit and I don't care what the once proud New York times posted. Our media is shit.
Ron Paul has support from some white hate groups because like them, he want less government, no different than Barack having support from Black Panthers. Neither one of them, I would consider a racist. Like the YOutube clips I posted, Ron Paul asks the question why are so many blacks in prision. He also has support from blacks, but of course that does not support the new Ron Paul is a racist angle, so his support from black voters goes ingnored. That would not play well with Ron Paul is a racist, angle. Like I said our media is agenda driven.
I want to be clear, I agree with some of what Ron Paul says, the dude has great ideas, some of his other ideas I am against, but to fall into the media trap that he is a racist is just redonkulous.
I also don't know who I am voting for as president. Barack has been a let down and seems like the typical corporate candidate. He talks a good game but look at his appointees and history of donors, the dude is up to his ears in corporate money. For me it might be another vote for the enemy I know.
