I would have said no too. It's just a continuing resolution with no cuts. It's a stall tactic. If the dems don't want to vote for it in the senate, let them take a road trip. It seems to be all the rage when you can't vote present!
Which is it? A "continuing resolution" or a "stall tactic". My understanding is these "continuing resolutions" have been par for the course in decades of negotiation. Except, of course, 1995. And we all know what a debacle that was for the Republicans.
Was it a "stall tactic" in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2005? Or was it a "continuing resolution"?
