Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 05:46:14 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: THE ONLY POLITICAL FORUM OUT THERE WHOSE ADMIN AND MODS DON'T LIE.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Abortion: OK For the Romney's, Not For You!

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Abortion: OK For the Romney's, Not For You!  (Read 1148 times)
0 Members and 45 Guests are viewing this topic.
Howey
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +693/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 9436



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« on: September 22, 2012, 06:27:38 pm »

I guess what's good for the Romney's isn't good for the 99%, huh?

Quote
The twin boys -- David Mitt and William Ryder -- were born on May 4, 2012.  We've learned Tagg and his wife Jen, along with the surrogate and her husband, signed a Gestational Carrier Agreement dated July 28, 2011.  Paragraph 13 of the agreement reads as follows:
   
"If in the opinion of the treating physician or her independent obstetrician there is potential physical harm to the surrogate, the decision to abort or not abort is to be made by the surrogate."

Translation:  Tagg and Jen gave the surrogate the right to abort the fetuses even if her life wasn't in danger.  All the surrogate has to show is "potential physical harm," which could be something like preeclampsia -- a type of high blood pressure that could damage the mother's liver, kidney or brain, but is not necessarily life-threatening.

That's fine. Abortion when the mother's life is in danger. Mitt's in favor of that, right? Oh. So it's the decision of the woman carrying the baby, you say? No.

Quote
Paragraph 13 goes on:

"In the event the child is determined to be physiologically, genetically or chromosomally abnormal, the decision to abort or not to abort is to be made by the intended parents.  In such a case the surrogate agrees to abort, or not to abort, in accordance with the intended parents' decision."

And I thought Mormon's liked their large families? You know...to spread the word and all that...

Quote
And there's another relevant provision in Paragraph 13:

"Any decision to abort because of potential harm to the child, or to reduce the number of fetuses, is to be made by the intended parents."

Translation:  Tagg and his wife, Jen, had the right to abort the fetuses if they felt they would not be healthy.

Well. Mitt may not have known, right?

Quote
Sources connected with Mitt Romney tell TMZ, Mitt was involved in the surrogate arrangement because he paid some of the expenses connected with the agreement.  We do not know if Mitt Romney read the contract or knew the terms.

OK, Mitt may not have read the contract he paid for. That's par for the course for all good businessmen aspiring to be President, isn't it?
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

ekg
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +335/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 4094


http://www.thevsj.com


View Profile WWW
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2012, 09:57:41 pm »

 the type of procedure they used to get pregnant wouldn't be allowed under the personhood amendment anyway.. and Mitt supports personhood..

it's a very odd thing he's got going on.. a literal 'do as I say, not as I do'..  now we know he thinks the people who only pay payroll taxes of 15-35% are the loser, moocher class.. while him paying 13 and 14% makes him a smart and savvy businessman..

do as I say, not as I do..

Report Spam   Logged

Facts are the center. We don’t pretend that certain facts are in dispute to give the appearance of fairness to people who don’t believe them.  Balance is irrelevant to me.  It doesn’t have anything to do with truth, logic or reality. ~Charlie Skinner (the Newsroom)

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy