Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 07:19:40 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: WE NOW HAVE A "GRIN" OR "GROAN" FEATURE UNDER THE KARMA.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Sex Ed - More Conservative Distortion

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sex Ed - More Conservative Distortion  (Read 195 times)
0 Members and 93 Guests are viewing this topic.
Howey
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +693/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 9436



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« on: September 03, 2013, 05:31:20 pm »

Seems like we go through this every year about school time...it's no different this year.

Quote
When Chicago’s Department of Education first began considering the new curricula this past spring, it sparked some controversy among conservatives who raised alarm about its potential to shatter elementary school students’ innocence. And now that students are heading back to school for the first year that the new standards will be in place, they’re back in full force.

Several right-wing outlets proclaimed that Chicago is set to begin “sex ed for kindergartners.” But that rhetoric slipped into mainstream outlets, too. A local ABC affiliate published a story on Tuesday under the headline “Sex Education To Be Offered For Chicago Kindergartners.” A local CBS affiliate published a similar story on Sunday with the following lede: “Some people may think a five-year old is too young for sex education. Administrators with Chicago Public schools do not.”

Soon, conservative outlets moved onto the next round of the “scandal”: President Obama approves of kindergarten sex ed. CNS News dug up a clip of Obama from 2007 in which the then-senator expresses his support for “medically accurate, age-appropriate, and responsible sex education” at every grade level. Six years ago, that benign statement sparked its own round of “kindergarten sex ed” headlines. This week, right-wing sites re-upped them.

So what’s at the root of all of this concern? What kind of salacious details will Chicago’s youngest students be receiving, thanks to the new sex ed guidelines? What does Obama want to force kindergartners to sit through?

According to Chicago Public Schools’ chief health officer, Stephanie Whyte, kindergartners and first-graders will learn about anatomy, healthy relationships, and personal safety. The teachers for those grades will design lesson plans around topics like “my body,” “good touch vs. bad touch,” and “living things that reproduce.” By fourth grade, kids will start learning about the “physical, social, and emotional aspects of puberty.” Students won’t receive information about human reproduction and contraception until middle school.

Back in February, Whyte explained that the updated rules were spurred by the fact that over half of Chicago teens are sexually active, and the county’s STD rates are high. Chicago’s move coincides with a new state law that requires Illinois schools to include accurate information about birth control in sex ed classes.

Despite the recent round of fear mongering over “kindergarten sex ed,” comprehensive sexual health classes are not actually controversial among parents — especially since age-appropriate guidelines ensure that kindergartners don’t receive the same information as high schoolers. Pediatricians and psychologists encourage anatomy classes for young children, particularly so kids can learn the correct words for their genitalia, as an important way of teaching bodily autonomy and helping to prevent sexual crimes.


The right consistently makes themselves look like fools for all this faux manufactured outrage, although I admit it does rile their uneducated masses. Do they really think the schools are teaching five year olds how to fuck?

btw...ekg.

You're not aware of this, but I'm banned for a month from JPP for saying this in a similar thread:


Quote
Rule 12: "back then that Uncle Bruce touching them down there wasn't right." - " avoid any and all mention of descriptive encounters with children. It is unacceptable to bring that onto the board in any context."

Left out, of course, was what preceeded it:

Quote
"Just think how many homophobes today would be mentally stable if they had been taught..."

A prime example of how to distort truth to get rid of someone...I swear I haven't seen stupid like this since Mickey, oh! Surprise! He was a libertarian too, wasn't he?
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy