Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 02:20:59 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: WE NOW HAVE A "GRIN" OR "GROAN" FEATURE UNDER THE KARMA.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

The LOJCSGPBTGTSA

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The LOJCSGPBTGTSA  (Read 3083 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Howey
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +693/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 9436



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« on: March 23, 2011, 05:18:45 pm »

18.Get rid of fluorescent light bulbs.

Thanks for bringing this up. I meant to a while back. Just reading the justitification for this is hilarious!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/10/gop-republican-light-bulb-mandate_n_834294.html

Quote
Sen. Mike Enzi has a dim view of a federal law requiring light bulbs to be more efficient.

The Wyoming Republican is pushing a bill to repeal the 2007 law and give consumers the choice to buy any light bulbs they want.

"Government doesn't need to be in the business of telling people what light bulb they have to use," Enzi said. "If left alone, the best bulb will win its rightful standing in the marketplace."

Twenty-seven senators – all Republicans – support the bill, but many Democrats and consumer groups say the plan is not so bright. They call it a step backward and compare it to trading in a fuel-efficient hybrid car for a gas-guzzling SUV.

Enzi's bill, and related measures in the House, "would push aside innovation, derail plans for new job-creating lighting factories and eliminate an estimated $10 billion in annual energy costs savings – taking as much as $200 per year out of the checkbooks of every U.S. household," said Bob Keefe, a spokesman for the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group that backs the 2007 law.

Despite some GOP claims to the contrary, the 2007 law does not ban traditional incandescent light bulbs. Instead it requires new bulbs to use 25 to 30 percent less energy beginning in 2012. The rules call for further improvements in efficiency by 2014. The new standards have already taken effect in California.

Compact fluorescent light bulbs that are now widely available cut energy costs by as much as 75 percent and have proved popular with the public, Keefe said. A February poll by USA Today found that nearly three out of four Americans have purchased energy-efficient light bulbs and 84 percent said they were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with them.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman, a New Mexico Democrat who chairs the Senate Energy Committee, said the new bulbs last longer, use less energy and save money.

Howard Brandston, a lighting consultant from upstate New York, said government should not tell consumers how to light their homes.

Meanwhile, back at the looney farm - they're UNCONSTITUTIONAL!:

Quote
Light bulb hysteria is running wild over at Fox News, as Bret Baier used his Special Report program to highlight the dangers of dropping an energy efficient light bulb. The Fox News show ran a poll asking their viewers if they will hoard traditional light bulbs and even read the EPA warning about the dangers of a broken CFL on the air. The network said the light bulbs were a violation of the Constitution, just like low flow toilets.
Here’s the video from Media Matters:
 

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201103220043
« Last Edit: March 23, 2011, 05:21:23 pm by Howey » Report Spam   Logged


Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy