I guess this could be a good time to point out that some of the money came from an employee PAC was in the second paragraph of the article I posted, however if I did point that out, it might lead someone to think that you didn't do any research whatsoever. Not even to bother to actually read the article, and instead went on an internet search for some sort of counter vailing opinion. And instead of finding something that you could proudly source, you just found a collection of blogs, and decided to leave your quote unsourced so I wouldn't mock it.
When really all you had to do was read the second paragraph in the article.
I did. This is what it said.
Donations come from a mix of employees and the company’s political action committees — $2.89 million flowed to campaigns from BP-related PACs and about $638,000 came from individuals.
2.89mil came from the company.
638,000 came from individual employees. Not an employee PAC.
