Well Prick Santorum said 1 in 3 pregancies end in abortion and that is why we can not fund Social Security.
Wait. Was that Santorum or Kyl?
Was it intended to NOT be a factual statement?
Kyl:
If you want an abortion you go to Planned Parenthood and that's well over 90 percent of what Planned Parenthood does.
Oops!
His remark was not intended to be a factual statement, but rather to illustrate that Planned Parenthood, a organization that receives millions of dollars in taxpayer funding, does subsidize abortions.
So if there's no big to-do, why go through all this?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/21/jon-kyl-factual-statement-congressional-record_n_852257.htmlI missed this when it was reported a couple days ago, but apparently, a few days after Senator Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) stood on the Senate floor and misled America about what proportion of Planned Parenthood's activities were related to abortion -- which begat his famous "not intended to be a factual statement" excuse that brought a torrent of ridicule down upon him -- Kyl had his false statement stricken from the Congressional Record. You can do that? Apparently so!
Senators enjoy a neat perk: the right to "revise" and "extend" their remarks.
WTF?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htNCjvdU9R4&feature=player_embedded