Can you explain, please?
I'm saying that if the people like us who are limited by the two party system could encourage enough bipartisanship outside of existing labels;congress needs to get the message that being on one side or the other on an issue doesn't count anymore because nothing changes the drums of war. It's like with the budget stuff, it's about like professional wrestling with the outcome predetermined before the wrangling.
In other words if senators x,y and z really wanted to do something about Libya(it was bipartisan)they would and could. Anything else is unadulterated bullshit.
