Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 07:09:16 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: OUR POLITIKAL SECTION IS A TROLL FREE AREA. ACT ACCORDINGLY.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Clarence and Ginny - Crazy Love!

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Clarence and Ginny - Crazy Love!  (Read 740 times)
0 Members and 73 Guests are viewing this topic.
Howey
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +693/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 9436



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« on: February 15, 2011, 12:41:15 pm »

Oops. No wonder he hasn't opened his mouth in four years!

<object width="420" height="245" id="msnbc65af0c" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"

https://myaccount.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/15/us/politics/15thomas.html&OQ=_rQ3D1

Quote
Discrepancies in reports about an appearance by Justice Clarence Thomas at a political retreat for wealthy conservatives three years ago have prompted new questions to the Supreme Court from a group that advocates changing campaign finance laws.

When questions were first raised about the retreat last month, a court spokeswoman said Justice Thomas had made a "brief drop-by" at the event in Palm Springs, Calif., in January 2008 and had given a talk.

In his financial disclosure report for that year, however, Justice Thomas reported that the Federalist Society, a prominent conservative legal group, had reimbursed him an undisclosed amount for four days of "transportation, meals and accommodations" over the weekend of the retreat.

Just how much has he not filed with the IRS?

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2011_02/028005.php

Quote
To be sure, whether Thomas "dropped by" or stayed for four days may seem pretty thin as scandals go, but the fact that he's offered competing versions of events about this retreat matters. Indeed, in this case, Thomas attended an event where powerful conservatives discussed strategies for overturning campaign finance laws. This was soon followed by Thomas participating in a case related to campaign finance laws, and concluded with Thomas ruling to overturn campaign finance laws, giving the Koch Brothers considerably more political power.

If Thomas, as a guest at the retreat, was part of these strategy talks, then maybe he should have recused himself from the case?

For that matter, if Thomas is telling the truth and only "dropped by" the event briefly, why did he seek reimbursement for four days? Was this a gift Thomas failed to report? Or perhaps he claimed these reimbursements in order to evade taxes?

I'm still trying to imagine what the response would be if a similar situation arose with a center-left justice. How quickly would congressional Republicans raise the specter of impeachment?
Report Spam   Logged


Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy