Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 07:13:55 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: THE ONLY POLITICAL FORUM OUT THERE WHOSE ADMIN AND MODS DON'T LIE.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Einstein proven wrong on speed of light being the fastest  (Read 719 times)
0 Members and 102 Guests are viewing this topic.
betteroffhere
Founding Member
Noob
******

Karma: +25/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1139



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Level 6 Nineth year Anniversary
« on: September 25, 2011, 12:43:24 am »



The most interesting thing to me about this is that I don't doubt it but I don't believe it could possibly in any way discredit E=mc2. I feel the greater likelihood is that the speed of light would still be the standard since it is more than likely more closely associated with work that involves that formula;that there is a particle or more exceeding that speed would be a useful margin of consideration and new areas for study.

What I'm wondering I guess if you understand what I'm suggesting, is, doesn't it make sense? I believe that dualism hinders much advancement in the way the masses think, the sports example. In other words the majesty of the individual is so undermined in all systems of import that the very people who should be jubilant about this discovery are promoting it being poo pooed before it's even been peer reviewed.

in reference to the second paragraph....

first question...short answer....Yes !

maybe...idk...i'm no fucking scientist for gods sake !!!.... jesus christ...

i'm dealing with extremely limited information and education... yo !

light speed is able to reach that rate speed because it has zero mass...or something like that

it is a wave of somehow...idk how the fuck it travels or if it really even fucking moves...!!!

idk if it just a series of reflections or it actually has demensional features and occupies space in volume or

its not demensional but just a continuious series of reflections...that looks like it is moving...

what the fuck do i know...

if i remember correctly light is a vibrating frequency that is viewable with certain parameters...

so...theoretically...other frequencies should be faster than and slower than light...

finding them or looking at the question the right way however is the challenge that will lead us to the correct answer one day !

peace ! ... @betteroffhere2 on twitter #iamboh
Report Spam   Logged


Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy