|
Title: Veto'd ... Post by: ekg on April 19, 2011, 11:19:58 am 'Birther bill' vetoed by Arizona governor
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/18/arizona.president.bill.veto/index.html?hpt=T2 Quote CNN) -- Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed a bill late Monday that would have required President Barack Obama and other presidential candidates to prove they were American citizens, born in the United States, before their names could have been placed on the state ballot. The so-called "birther bill" got final approval in the state House last week. Now that Brewer, a Republican, has vetoed it, the bill will not become law unless legislators vote to override her veto. "As a former Secretary of State, I do not support designating one person as a gatekeeper to the ballot for a candidate, which could lead to arbitrary or politically-motivated decisions," the governor wrote in a letter addressed to the Arizona House speaker. Under the measure, if there were any dispute about whether a candidate had proved he or she had been born in the United States, Arizona's secretary of state would have the final say. "This measure creates significant new problems while failing to do anything constructive for Arizona," she added. Good job Brewer. I have to say, I was shocked.. but..question... isn't she the one (and the state) that started all these 'birther bills' to begin with? anyway.. more Quote Among other things, a candidate would have to show a copy of his or her birth certificate. If a birth certificate couldn't be produced, a candidate would have to show a combination of baptismal or circumcision records, hospital birth files, postpartum medical records or other documents. Candidates also would have to submit affidavits declaring their citizenship as well as sworn statements regarding their residency for the previous 14 years. "I never imagined being presented with a bill that could require candidates for President of the greatest and most powerful nation on earth to submit their 'early baptismal or circumcision certificates' among other records to the Arizona Secretary of State. This is a bridge too far," wrote Brewer. ya think? Bridge too far? really? huh.. (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v467/TMB/BluebirdNut/Emoticons/Misc/WaveHello.gif)sanity.. it's nice to see it again. Title: Re: Veto'd ... Post by: Howey on April 19, 2011, 11:37:40 am 'Birther bill' vetoed by Arizona governor http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/18/arizona.president.bill.veto/index.html?hpt=T2 Good job Brewer. I have to say, I was shocked.. So was I. She also vetoed this: http://popculturedoneright.smfforfree.com/index.php/topic,396.0.html but..question... isn't she the one (and the state) that started all these 'birther bills' to begin with? Yes, she was, I believe. I'm just concerned she's just waiting for them to take out the language she didn't like so she can sign it. The folks at Fox are livid! Read the comments: http://nation.foxnews.com/gov-jan-brewer/2011/04/19/why-gov-brewer-vetoed-arizonas-birther-bill Hilarious stupidity! btw - Can someone answer a question? Aren't the qualifications for the President in the Constitution? Title: Re: Veto'd ... Post by: uselesslegs on April 19, 2011, 12:51:36 pm Well, if numbers are any indication, the house will most likely have the 2/3's to override her veto...if they choose to pursue it. Circumcision or Baptismal papers...bah. |