Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 07:03:58 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: OUR POLITIKAL SECTION IS A TROLL FREE AREA. ACT ACCORDINGLY.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Veto'd ...

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Veto'd ...  (Read 390 times)
0 Members and 40 Guests are viewing this topic.
ekg
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +335/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 4094


http://www.thevsj.com


View Profile WWW
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« on: April 19, 2011, 11:19:58 am »

'Birther bill' vetoed by Arizona governor

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/18/arizona.president.bill.veto/index.html?hpt=T2
Quote
CNN) -- Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed a bill late Monday that would have required President Barack Obama and other presidential candidates to prove they were American citizens, born in the United States, before their names could have been placed on the state ballot.

The so-called "birther bill" got final approval in the state House last week. Now that Brewer, a Republican, has vetoed it, the bill will not become law unless legislators vote to override her veto.

"As a former Secretary of State, I do not support designating one person as a gatekeeper to the ballot for a candidate, which could lead to arbitrary or politically-motivated decisions," the governor wrote in a letter addressed to the Arizona House speaker.

Under the measure, if there were any dispute about whether a candidate had proved he or she had been born in the United States, Arizona's secretary of state would have the final say.

"This measure creates significant new problems while failing to do anything constructive for Arizona," she added.


Good job Brewer. I have to say, I was shocked..

but..question... isn't she the one (and the state) that started all these 'birther bills' to begin with?

anyway.. more


Quote
Among other things, a candidate would have to show a copy of his or her birth certificate. If a birth certificate couldn't be produced, a candidate would have to show a combination of baptismal or circumcision records, hospital birth files, postpartum medical records or other documents. Candidates also would have to submit affidavits declaring their citizenship as well as sworn statements regarding their residency for the previous 14 years.

"I never imagined being presented with a bill that could require candidates for President of the greatest and most powerful nation on earth to submit their 'early baptismal or circumcision certificates' among other records to the Arizona Secretary of State. This is a bridge too far," wrote Brewer.

ya think?  Bridge too far? really? 

huh..
 
sanity.. it's nice to see it again.
Report Spam   Logged

Facts are the center. We don’t pretend that certain facts are in dispute to give the appearance of fairness to people who don’t believe them.  Balance is irrelevant to me.  It doesn’t have anything to do with truth, logic or reality. ~Charlie Skinner (the Newsroom)

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Howey
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +693/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 9436



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2011, 11:37:40 am »

'Birther bill' vetoed by Arizona governor

http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/18/arizona.president.bill.veto/index.html?hpt=T2

Good job Brewer. I have to say, I was shocked..


So was I. She also vetoed this:

http://popculturedoneright.smfforfree.com/index.php/topic,396.0.html


but..question... isn't she the one (and the state) that started all these 'birther bills' to begin with?

Yes, she was, I believe. I'm just concerned she's just waiting for them to take out the language she didn't like so she can sign it.

The folks at Fox are livid! Read the comments:

http://nation.foxnews.com/gov-jan-brewer/2011/04/19/why-gov-brewer-vetoed-arizonas-birther-bill

Hilarious stupidity!

btw - Can someone answer a question?

Aren't the qualifications for the President in the Constitution?
Report Spam   Logged

uselesslegs
Noob
*

Karma: +390/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1601



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Fifth year Anniversary Level 5 Fourth year Anniversary
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2011, 12:51:36 pm »

Well, if numbers are any indication, the house will most likely have the 2/3's to override her veto...if they choose to pursue it.

Circumcision or Baptismal papers...bah.
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy