It was BS when Reid pulled it and it's BS now. 16 times under Democrats and 197 times for the GOP. If there's cause or reason for legitimate worry of an appointment, I can see this perhaps being used to muddy up the waters until it can be addressed by a committee or hearing. Otherwise, it's a BS abuse of power that does nothing but debilitate our ability to proceed forward with the nations business.
197 times...really? I mean, come the fuck on.
If that's your issue, you totally missed any point I was trying to make. I don't care about legitimate and legal recess appointments. I care about the President violating the constitution (again). If you're just concerned about the number of recess appointments and which President did the most, than you can't see the forest for the recess appointments. The only important issue (IMHO) is that the President made a recess appointment where there was no recess.
