Eventually.
I'm thinking that that you didn't read that full article from Reason. The article was about the 1st Amendment; one of those troublesome legacies of the constitution that gets in the way of your schemes. I'm you just searched for the word corporations. The entire case was brought to the Supreme Court because the movie was banned. Not to grant corporations "a living soul."
I opposed that law, passed under the Bush regime, and welcomed it's demise under the Obama regime.
That is the whole point, and why I suggested you go back and reread the muche arguments about it, because you, and this subject, are a bit boring at this point because of your steadfast ignorance. You guys seem to think the concept of corporate personhood sprung full from Citizen's United, like Athena popping out of Zeus's forehead, instead of a being a centuries old legal concept. Political speech is the purpose of the first amendment; not, as you guys think, for protecting crucifix's in bottles of piss being shown at public facilities. The fact that you've exposed yourselves as opposing one of the core principles of our republic sure is revealing.
There are some subjects that you just don't have the background to discuss intelligently, and certainly anything having to do with the law is one of them. You're l
Eventually.
I'm thinking that that you didn't read that full article from Reason. The article was about the 1st Amendment; one of those troublesome legacies of the constitution that gets in the way of your schemes. I'm sure you just searched for the word corporations. The entire case was brought to the Supreme Court because the movie was banned. Not to grant corporations "a living soul."
I opposed that law, passed under the Bush regime, and welcomed it's demise under the Obama regime.
That is the whole point, and why I suggested you go back and reread the muche arguments about it, because you, and this subject, are a bit boring at this point because of your steadfast ignorance. You guys seem to think the concept of corporate personhood sprung full from Citizen's United, like Athena popping out of Zeus's forehead, instead of a being a centuries old legal concept. Political speech is the purpose of the first amendment; not, as you guys think, for protecting crucifix's in bottles of piss being shown at public facilities. The fact that you've exposed yourselves as opposing one of the core principles of our republic sure is revealing.
There are some subjects that you just don't have the background to discuss intelligently, and certainly anything having to do with the law is one of them. You're l
Wow. Your lilMind's imploded under the weight of silly insults! Just because I was right doesn't mean you've got to go all postal!
tee hee!
