I like him too.. but I think Obama can do more than he ever would. He just doesn't have 'it'... (whatever 'it' is)
Well he's no savior of mankind like Obama, but more to the point, the it he doesn't have is being a registered Democrat. Anyway, you wouldn't like him if you knew more about him, which is part of his problem.
I'm not either choice.. but I that's because I don't believe you so... HA!
Look,I know you would like Paul Ryan or Rand Paul or even Rubio.. and they simply aren't any where near Huntsman.. he's almost Obama and Mitt rolled into one..neither of which are a Paul,Ryan or Rubio..
you voted for Rick Scott for pete's sake.. that's as anti-Huntsman as you can get..
but when asked the question you were asked, Huntsman
is the 'safe' answer.. and we all know you love a safe answer...
I picked Huntsman of the people who are actually running, so yes, out of the sea of qualified people who are not running, I could find quite a few choices better than Huntsman. Ryan, Rubio, or Christie might easily fill the bill. I'm not so sure about Rand, since I don't quite have a full grasp of him, although I've been pleased by his actions in the Senate so far.
I don't see how that's the "safe" answer though. What unsafe answer would you expect me to choose?
