No mention that "President Obama, a Protestant whose most recent church membership was a mainline congregation, Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, gave relatively little to charity a decade ago, but steadily increased his giving as he became more prominent and donated 14 percent of his income in 2010?"
So you don't think that enough attention has been paid to the fact that Obama donated very little to charity until he became a national public figure?
does it say how much he donated per his income... IRC he wasn't making millions for awhile there..so what was his donations vs his pre-book income..
in 2000 they were making $240,505 but I don't know how much they donated..
in 2006 they made 900,000+ and they donated $60,307 to charities, or about 6 percent of their gross income.
in 2005 they donate $5000, but thats also the year he got the book money and they bought their house..
I guess the 'relatively' in that "relatively little' means relative to Mitt giving $millions.. well the Obama didn't have millions and when they did, they increased their donation to 14%... kinda like the article says..
he always donated what he could and when he started to make more money, he started to donate more..
so the problem you have with this what Mike?