dance monkey dance..
I can actually 'conceive' of you not 'hating' Obama when I hated Bush,(and not personally btw, personally, he would have been a great person to hang around with..a pretty funny dorky guy IMO)..the problem is, I don't see anything but 'hate' coming from you.. Sure, you're not as insulting as some more rapid of your party..you're more 'plausible deniability' and 'backhanded' than that... but it's there in every post you make. You can't even give him any credit when it's due.. I don't remember, did you even give him credit for OBL? The Somali pirates? the hostage takers from last week? any credit at all? or did you just ignore it, or leave off his role in it and give congrats to others?
Giving credit for things Obama has done right (like UBL and the pirates) is similar to me criticizing the Bush administration for things they did wrong. I criticized the Bush administration for a lot of things they did, practically their entire domestic agenda, and you seemed to remember it as praise. On the muche, no matter how many times I responded to your request to criticize Bush administration policies, you never remembered and then the next time it was Groundhog Day all over. It must be a Bush critic dementia that was associated with Bush Derangement Syndrome.
It’s sort of an opposite thing here. There have been a lot of things in regards to national security that I’ve praised the Obama administration for. But you can’t seem to remember that either. It’s a whole new day with you in that subject too. Even if you were right – which of course you’re not, how does that equal hate? I vividly remember your hatred, and hatred that you felt was a righteous hatred totally justified. How does that compare with anything that I’ve written? Show me something I’ve written dripping with the hatred you used to display.
do you have a nominee yet?
didn't think so..
until you do... and it's not her, then I guess you can keep dancing...
Darn!
you do get that McCain would have done the same thing.. as would/will Romney,Paul and Santorum.. why? because it's the only option.. your option, who knows what it would do.. because it's never been tested on an economy our size with the devestation we've gone through along with the rest of the world... so you can pat yourself on the back that you'd be right.. but we both know that that's like patting yourself on the back for saying 9/11 wouldn't have happened under Gore.. Sure I can make that argument and be right... too bad we can never know for sure..
Here's the rub.. people were struggling .. with and without their houses.. Lets pretend the right way may be to let them all live or die on their own.. rich and poor alike and after wards maybe we'll be stronger.. Let's pretend that while we're losing 750,000 jobs a month, we're going to let the auto industry die out as well, adding an additional couple million more people to the unemployment rolls..Let's pretend that with wall street dropping like shit threw a duck, we just let it keep falling without any invention... I've seen the world you just created... It's called Mad Max.. and it ain't pretty.... no matter who was president, not a single politician was going to let that happen.. and now, with it just starting to get better, Every one of them is going to renew UI benefits, every one of them is going to keep the food stamp eligibility rate what it is, every one of them is going to keep medicare/medicaid/ss payments and plan going.. and everyone of them will say they are going to change it,but not until 2017 or some year in the future when we're finally getting back on our feet again and can afford to start cutting.. If you don't believe that, you' haven't been paying attention enough....why? because rhetoric gets you elected and when you're there it's a whole other ball game cutting funds and programs that will literally force millions into the streets begging for food..
Like I said, you and the GOP are only latching on to your 'principals' right now because its Obama in the office.. your only goal is to change that.. you are not going to give advice or opinions that would help him succeed.. what you'll do is, condemn his every move and then ignore all that when you're in the white house doing the same thing because at this moment in time, in order to restore this country, this is what has to be done..
don't forget, it was a member of your party who started this mess with his tax cuts that cost billions, his wars that cost billions and his medicare part d program.. again billions.. all unpaid for.. and off the books... but now, with Obama, it's on the books and you're shitting yourself.. well sorry, putting the cost iof the GWB presidency on the books isn't socialism ,Marxism or even Kenyan secular colonialism.. it's just good fucking business..
This is starting to sound like a rebit. You insist that anyone would have to do exactly what Obama did because what he did was the only right way to handle things. I’d say apparently not. McCain had plans in his platform that were quite a bit different, and I would argue, better.
But the idea that it’s inconceivable that there was any other way to handle things than the Obama way… what can I say? You have a very limited and rigid ideology and can’t really see beyond it. Luckily, I understand you guys, WAY better than you can understand me. I would explain why but that would be a rebit too.
blah blah.. dance monkey... all I know is that you so dearly want to compare to greece and well.. greece went the 'cutting' route and got fucked for it.. so if you want to look at them, look at that and be glad we're not doing what they did and stfu about greece already..
huh... I don't think I've seen anyone who needs validation so badly that every other sentence is some play on "I was right" .. interesting.. wrong and sad.. but interesting
but thanks for giving Howie a new reply when you dodge questions...
"Nevermind, I knew you were lying.. I was just trying to smoke you out"
LOL! I don’t think Howey needs someone to feed him new insults. He’s not exactly clever or original in that department, but he keeps plugging away.
