Hilaryrosengate

while it's taken 'in context' correctly, it's been overblown as if she didn't clarify her meaning immediately after the 'oops'

actually never worked a day in her life.”

was followed by, and has been largely ignored just so Fox can get their panties is a twist, with.. "“She’s never really dealt with the kinds of economic issues that a majority of the women in this country are facing in terms of how do we feed our kids, how do we send them to school and how do we — why we worry about their future.”

and she's correct, Ann Romney hasn't worked a day in her life and gone through this.. That's not say being a mother isn't work, it is.. but this person has not gone even a smidgen on what working mothers go through..

I don't believe Hil was disparaging stay-at-home moms in anyway, unlike Fox who has done but fuel that bogus fire in an attempt to take the spotlight off their and their party's 'war on women' campaign.. I believe she was saying exactly what she said, Mitt is saying he gets his economic opinion input from his wife, well wtf? She hasn't worked, *outside the home* (what Hil should have quantified), a day in her wife/mother life, so how can Mitt give her economic input and give it any real weight? It'd be like taking my input on the intricacies of the Stock Exchange and using that as a 'governing' concept..

was is a bad remark taken by itself? yeah.. she should have quantified it better to get through that she was talking about a 9-5 job/work...yes.. was it an attack on Ann Romney, not in the least.. not even a teeny-tiny bit.. Is it being exploited as it's the new Watergate scandal? Of course. The left forgets from time to time that they must be on their toes 100% of the time, any tiny misstep will be exaggerated and exploited as some kind of treason or attack or racism all in order to give the Right an "AHA! SEE..." to use as a shield as they go about destroying personal freedoms,science,intelligence, and general order..