That explanation might have been believable if you had actually quoted JBG, instead if entering the quote anonymously.
That merely makes it look suspicious.
You're joking right?
or just drunk?
I had referred you to his quote twice before..
1st time
I think the article I gave and JBG's reply is pretty easy to understand,
2nd time
I don't think I'm hiding anything from you or dodging any question, I just can't explain it any better than it's already been explained to you by me,cnn,and JBG..
on the 3rd time, if you didn't know by now what he had said, then that's on you.. I knew what he said.. and I knew I was referring to him again, since I said AGAIN..
.it's already been explained to youJesus, do you see how partsian and childish you are being yet?
Like it's been explained to you already,
>here comes that explanation from jbg that I've referred you to twice before<There is no overall marching plan. There hasn't been for decades. We base our foreign policy on the current political situation and then we change it.
pull your head out of the partsian feeding bag already..
but instead of admitting you got it wrong and that you attributed things towards me that are false... to save your own face.... You make it out that I'm unbelievable and suspicious..?
You would really cast dispersions upon an innocent person just because you made an error in reading?
well hell and here my mom taught me 'Oops, sorry" was the right way... clearly your way to blame and impeach those around you to take away from your errors..
such a sweet guy you are..
No Mike, it's your filter that is fucked up..not mine. You erred here, were corrected, and instead of manning up, you turn it into
I'm the suspicious one..
RE
Say, what would you like to see happen in Libya?
right..Like that's gonna happen.
