My comments were all addressed to the correct poster and I went so far as to include the post I was responding to.
I fail to see how my response to uselesslegs was inappropriate, since my post was directed to clarity if his job was to answer for Howie.
"Do you normally find it necessary to "explain" Howie's comments, or is that just your duty here?"
Unless you're suggesting that Howie is unable to answer questions directed to him/her.
JPP has a lot of people who just visit. Why are you drawing the conclusion that I was a poster there; except for Howie's assertion that I'm supposed to be one of several names that have been brought forth?
I'd also like to remind you of the following:
As we're all aware, religion and politics bring out the passion of people discussing them. As a free nation, we're given the right to Free Speech by the Constitution. Free Speech, however, comes with it's limits. Let's try to be civil when discussing issues that we're passionate about. Avoid personal attacks. Let's try not to call each other stupid or ignorant or like terms that only degrade the discussion and bring it down to a personal level.
Mind you - this does not apply to persons who have, through their own choice, put themselves and their families in the political spotlight. By doing so, they are fair game.
Since we are a representative democracy here, infractions reported to the preceeding guidelines will be dealt with by myself or ekg. I, for one, do not believe in banning someone who occasionally crosses the line, yet constant and persistent trollish behavior will result in a suspension from the Town Hall for a period set by ekg.
Thank you and enjoy your stay!
