If, accepting your proposition, that Barbour's comment is a "statement of fact" then you would need a statement of fact to disprove it. All you are saying is that Barbour hasn't proven his statement, but neither have you. That doesn't make Barbour correct but it doesn't make him a liar. Particularly since we don't know what the origin of that statement is.
You guys on the left really misuse the word lie. It's like you really don't know what it means.
it is odd...
while he admits it is possible...
he still maintains the statement is an out right lie...
Statement of Fact
