Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 12:30:10 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: THE ONLY POLITICAL FORUM OUT THERE WHOSE ADMIN AND MODS DON'T LIE.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Benghazigate

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Benghazigate  (Read 1130 times)
0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.
ekg
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +335/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 4094


http://www.thevsj.com


View Profile WWW
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« on: May 10, 2013, 09:02:55 pm »


1. F-16s could have been sent to Benghazi

Part of the prevailing theory surrounding the events the night of the Benghazi attacks is that the Obama administration did not do enough militarily to respond to the crisis. Gregory Hicks — a Foreign Service Officer and the former Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya — claimed during his pre-hearing testimony that fighter jets could have been flown over Benghazi, preventing the second wave of the attack from occurring.

Ranking Member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) questioned that statement, asking Hicks whether he disagreed with Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Gen Martin Dempsey’s assessment that no air assets were in range the night of the attack. Hicks didn’t disagree, saying he was “speaking from [his] perspective” and what “veteran Libyan revolutionaries” told him, rather than Pentagon assessments.

what the fuck?

read that again...

notice it?

Gregory "whistleblower" Hicks  made FoxNews cum on their shoes by saying in 'pretrial' that f-16's could have saved everyone if Obama had just deployed them..OHhhhh they finally had it. They finally had that single peice that would end the Obama presidency. After months and months  they had their vindication with this 'whistle-blower'..


....but under sworn testimony.. when asked if he disagreed with with  the fucking Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff that no, no planes were available.. he, this 'whistle-blower' who just last week regaled Hannity,Beck,Rush et al with his 'inside,whistle blowing' knowledge said "Uh, no I don't disagree.. I was just saying I thought there could be planes because I know planes fly in the air ya know.. I've seen them.. so I uh, figured there could have been planes.. besides, a local Libyan guy agreed with me.. So uh, did I blow the whistle loud enough Mr. Issa?"..


asking Hicks whether he disagreed with Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff Gen Martin Dempsey’s assessment that no air assets were in range the night of the attack. Hicks didn’t disagree, saying he was “speaking from [his] perspective” and what “veteran Libyan revolutionaries” told him, rather than Pentagon assessments.



Holy-shit-fuck-balls... are you kidding me? This.. THIS is what we're down to now? Some fucking guy who wasn't even there until after the fact, who doesn't know shit and instead knowing any thing more than the Pentagon, just inserts his own opinion and the opinion of a local "Veteran" Libyan militia guy IE Goat herder....That's who is going to bring down the Obama presidency for it's worse than water-gate and iran-contra conspiracy?

we should be so fucking ashamed of ourselves right now..



Report Spam   Logged

Facts are the center. We don’t pretend that certain facts are in dispute to give the appearance of fairness to people who don’t believe them.  Balance is irrelevant to me.  It doesn’t have anything to do with truth, logic or reality. ~Charlie Skinner (the Newsroom)

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy