Meh... I still agree with evolution...I just don't see a problem with a teacher being honest and saying evolution doesn't have an explanation for the original creations of life and saying, some people answer that question with the belief of an intelligent creator. I'm definitely not a 6000-year-old-Earth creationist, haha. Genetic drift and natural selection don't justify the first beginnings of life. It's false for evolutionists to say, "we can explain how life was created"...they have a good explanation for how life has changed over time. But it stops there. Biopoesis has a theory on the creation of life, but I don't EVER recall being taught that in school... I had to go dig that one up on my own, and it's never the subject of the debate.
I don't see evolution and a theory of an intelligent creator being opposite or opposed of each other. My source for that isn't, and never has been the Discovery Institute, who are evidently partisan fucks, haha.
