Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 07:13:45 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: THE ONLY POLITICAL FORUM OUT THERE WHOSE ADMIN AND MODS DON'T LIE.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Repubs, do you have no shame? oh wait, you don't

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Repubs, do you have no shame? oh wait, you don't  (Read 297 times)
0 Members and 101 Guests are viewing this topic.
paddymcdougall
Expats!
Noob
*

Karma: +5742/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 1559


View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Fourth year Anniversary Third year Anniversary Level 5
« on: September 01, 2013, 11:44:51 am »

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/08/31/20273174-congress-be-careful-what-you-wish-for?lite

Quote
The funny thing about a dog that chases a car? Sometimes it catches the car and has no idea what to do next.

Over the last several days, members of Congress have spoken out with a variety of opinions about U.S. policy towards Syria, but lawmakers were in broad agreement about one thing: they wanted President Obama to engage Congress on the use of military force. Few expected the White House to take the requests too seriously.

Why not? Because over the last several decades, presidents in both parties have increasingly consolidated authority over national security matters, tilting practically all power over the use of force towards the Oval Office and away from the legislative branch. Whereas the Constitution and the War Powers Act intended to serve as checks on presidential authority on military intervention abroad, there's been a gradual (ahem) drift away from these institutional norms.

That is, until this afternoon, when President Obama stunned everyone, announcing his decision to seek "authorization" from a co-equal branch of government.

It's one of those terrific examples of good politics and good policy. On the former, the American public clearly endorses the idea of Congress giving its approval before military strikes begin. On the latter, at the risk of putting too fine a point on this, Obama's move away from unilateralism reflects how our constitutional, democratic system of government is supposed to work.

Arguably the most amazing response to the news came from Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), the chair of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counterintelligence & Terrorism, and a member of the House Intelligence Committee:

    "President Obama is abdicating his responsibility as commander-in-chief and undermining the authority of future presidents. The President does not need Congress to authorize a strike on Syria."

This is one of those remarkable moments when a prominent member of Congress urges the White House to circumvent Congress, even after many of his colleagues spent the week making the exact opposite argument.

Do they really think we won't notice?
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Howey
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +693/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 9436



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2013, 12:40:57 pm »

lol...He's laid out a red line for Congress now. Go with me and face the consequences. Go against me and you face the consequences.
Report Spam   Logged

ekg
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +335/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 4094


http://www.thevsj.com


View Profile WWW
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2013, 08:52:54 pm »


I read something today that he's risking his presidency ending in nothing but embarrassment and the ruination of HRC's chance at election by going this route and people like cruz know it so they'll vote against him just out of spite and because they know he'll just do it anyway and then they can really hammer home how he's the usurper in chief..

but even that doesn't take the cake from what King said..

wow... winner of idiot award right there..
Report Spam   Logged

Facts are the center. We don’t pretend that certain facts are in dispute to give the appearance of fairness to people who don’t believe them.  Balance is irrelevant to me.  It doesn’t have anything to do with truth, logic or reality. ~Charlie Skinner (the Newsroom)

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy