Message #23734

[ekg]

I saw TDS skit with Nancy too... and agree that there is a difference here.. which of course is, while others may have reached out to foreign leaders..like you said, they didn't reach out with the specific goal of saying "BTW, you can't trust our president.. or in fact any president.. because they simply don't have any power to make agreements for the United States"

I simply can't for the life of me understand how HRC and emails are THE story and this gets 2nd tit.. IDK if the 'non' reaction is an effort to mitigate the damages by way of saying "Look, even the media thinks it's a sham so I guess other countries out there should ignore it too"... of if they just don't have the balls to cover it the same way they're covering Email-gate..

Or it could be the media understands that most of the population are to ignorant to get the nuanced differences in what Pelsoi did in trying to bring negotiations to the table and Cotton did with trying to thwart negotiations by claiming our Presidency has no power..

I will say this... I remember when Pelosi went to Syria and I remember Lil Mike and others arguing that she should be charged against the Logan act.. LOL.. if what she did was treason, I wonder what the same people think of what Cotton and the 47 did..