Ummm...since you like to bold/italicize stuff to make your point...I did the same thing in my very first post:
On the next page, although I didn't bold/italicize it, I made my point very clear - both on your stubborn refusal to get the point and on the real point of this conversation:
You continued this obstinate refusal to get the point...
...by naively insuinating that the only type of person who could influence Huckabee is a preacher...
We may or may not have because we didn't know about Obama or Wright (to a great extent) until then. Of course, you always had William Ayers to fall back on.
AHA!
Hold on...
Well go ahead, make the William Ayers case. Don't just drop the name. Make your argument.
You know, wow. Once again, right about Think Progress. I listened to that video and the comment about listening at gunpoint. It was a laugh line. There were laughs after that. However reading the Think Progress description of the same thing, it wasn't laughs, it was applause. Keep using TP though. It makes things so easy for me...
Now, why is this important, because all of you guys were real supporters of Huckabee before this came out?
Huckabee isn't my type of Republican, he's a social/religious conservative and a fiscal liberal, so I didn't support him in 2008 and I wasnt' going to support him in 2012, if he was running, which I can't imagine he would. He's already responded to that and admits he just couldn't raise that kind of money. So you can all breath easily.
But I hate for you guys to just causally drop inaccuracies and innuendo for the purpose of smearing someone. If your info is correct, than go ahead, but I notice accuracy is not a strength on certian lefty websites. Unfortunately it seems to be the ones you prefer to use.
