I'm not talking about the 'wright connection'. .. I'm talking about you only addressing the decision Howie made to title his thread 'Hucks Preacher"..your issue has been to argue that point and only that point..
over and over again.. What Huck said, not an issue with you.. whether this guy is nuttier than Wright, not an issue... whether it's a pretty huge story to have a presidential candidate advocating indoctrination of children and forced at gun point to listen to someone extreme visions, again.. not an issue for you.. the only issue is to ignore all of that and harp on whether or not Howies thread title is 100% literal and factual instead of just an easy title to make..
I don't seem to remember Obama insisting.. "that children need to be “under his tutelage” and said that every American should be forced “at gun point” to “listen to every David Barton message”: and then saying "I almost wish that there would be something like a simultaneous telecast and all Americans would be forced, forced — at gun point no less — to listen to every David Barton message. " about Wright even after those 20 years.. But I do remember the Wright/Obama being a huge thing for you.. it was just more proof he was inline with the Bill Ayers terrorists right?
but you can't even agree that this is even important...
can you..
Really? Huck's own words don't prove any of that you?
wait, you haven't even addressed that yet, because you're still on the argument that he's not really Huck's preacher, therefore, since you've proven that literally wrong, you are somehow correct in everything else..
again... you're not...
actually it's a discussion that would have lasted about 4 posts had you not continue to argue the title of the thread instead of ignoring the words that came out of Huck's mouth for his vision for America..
so there really was no 'importance'.. just trying to teach you how to engage in an actual conversation with people again, instead of continuing along in the 'kazz-bot' mode you've seem to have fallen in our debate-hiatus..
ok, I'll post the relationship again.. I assumed you caught it the 1st time you read it or even the next time after you said you read it again..
that is the relationship.. he wants every American, at gun point if necessary, to listen to this guys message..
Oh I think his words speak for themselves on what the relationship is.. as for them being 'close' or only having met a few times? well, with that kind of proclamation he's making, I would hope he'd know something about the guy.. wouldn't you?
are they as close as wright/obama? again, I don't recall Obama, after being as close as you say he was with Wright, ever said anything like this about him, So I just assume Huck's as close, if not closer... wouldn't you?
Finally. Even though it took 4 pages, you finally told me. The REAL issue is what Huckabee agreed with this guy about.
OK actually that wasnt' your real issue, it's merely the fall back one. It's amazing that it took this long, but rather than just being straight, you guys wanted to run round and round, trying to hang on to a false meme. Even when I agreed with you it just seemed to irritate you more.
I've zero interest in game playing. If you have an issue, just plainly say what it is. What I think you
wanted the issue to be was to just past this guy off as Huckabee's preacher. Thats why no one could dare agree with me that he wasn't.
Then the attack was on me for trying to "dodge" the issue. I just wonder how long you would have repeated this idea about him being Huckabee's preacher if I hadn't called you guys on it.
