So one president worked with other nations in a consensual military action intended to prevent the slaughter of thousands of people, an act that has resulted in 0 US casualities and worldwide acclaim.
Another president, acting on his own, ignored the wishes of his fellow nations and invaded a nation of people based on lies resulting in the senseless deaths of thousands of young Americans and hundreds of thousands of men, women and children in the country he invaded.
Thanks. I'm with the first guy who bypassed probably months of obstruction from a House whose majority didn't care about the possible deaths of thousands more men, women and children as long as they were able to disagree with the president.
If you recall my blog, I agreed that Obama was within the constitutional authority of his office to involve us in military action in Libya. I just get a kick that all you libs and Obama 2007 edition didn't think it was constitutional!
Now? It's Obama 2011 edition so it's constitutional!
You guys base your interpetation of the constitution on your crushes! I love it!
