Welcome to Bizarro Amerika!
January 27, 2026, 03:58:29 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: WE NOW HAVE A "GRIN" OR "GROAN" FEATURE UNDER THE KARMA.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Gay History

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Gay History  (Read 1758 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Howey
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +693/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 9436



View Profile
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« Reply #15 on: July 27, 2011, 09:23:08 am »

Quote
For the record, schools DON'T teach about men walking next to dinosaurs. You are more dramatic then my ex wife, Howey.

Your own home state (thankfully) shot down a proposal by Gov. Perry to do exactly that, Shannon. Other states may succeed...

http://news.yahoo.com/texas-leaders-debate-teaching-creationism-schools-011606986.html

Report Spam   Logged

ekg
Administrator
Noob
*****

Karma: +335/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 4094


http://www.thevsj.com


View Profile WWW
Badges: (View All)
Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary
« Reply #16 on: July 28, 2011, 01:06:33 pm »

Howey, what does one's sexual orientation have to do with their contributions to history? Read my previous posts. If you contributed to history, we teach about it. What does it matter that you are gay? Gay people have contributed to history since the beginning of time, valuable contributions. Does their sexuality make their contributions any more or less historic? I don't care that Tennesee Williams was gay, I do however value his literary works. Why does everyone have to have their sexuality as an identifier next to their
name?
You know me Howey. I may be conservative but I support gay rights, gay marriage, gay adoption etc. But to teach "gay history" is idiotic, divisive and counter productive.


only to people who have a fear/hate of homosexuals.. to those who don't, it's no different than teaching who Harriet Tubman was to the black community.. shouldn't young black women have a 'hero' to look up? or should we just find teaching 'black history' as idiotic,divisive and counter productive as well?

unfortunately, gays have been (and still are) are treated abhorrently by certain people in this country. Imagine being a young gay person and thinking the whole world hates you.. you know this because you can read the signs the homophobes put up, you can read the comments sections on 'gay-related' articles.. you know that in the 80's AIDS was largely ignored by the President of the United States because it was just a 'gay-disease'.. there is nothing but 'shame' associated with 'gay' in many many parts of this country.. so why can't we give a section of our culture it's rightful respect? why can't the gays have someone to look at as a 'hero' the same way we whites have Neil Armstrong, or the blacks have MLK? 

It doesn't divide us to know more about them, it divide us when we know less and hide the great ones away in the closest just because a few people can't get over their own sexual problems so they have to 'hate' on everyone elses..

think about it.. the more gays history is learned the more some people will go "well they can't all be bad because so and so was gay and that person was truly amazing!"

nah, hiding it is for small-minded people who are scared of knowledge.. and we should never fear knowledge
Report Spam   Logged

Facts are the center. We don’t pretend that certain facts are in dispute to give the appearance of fairness to people who don’t believe them.  Balance is irrelevant to me.  It doesn’t have anything to do with truth, logic or reality. ~Charlie Skinner (the Newsroom)

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy