Perchance like the employee who, with the aid of edited tape, was made to look like they were very interested in helping traffic children across boarders for sex trade...only to later find out his interest in asking where and when was called in to a local police detective...that was left off the edited tape?
One of many edits.
I might add...the second you include edited footage into the equation, the whole thing becomes dicey. I've said it before and I'll say it again...if you can't call attention to an issue or problem you've found, without edited video footage as part of your evidence, you shit all over any legitimacy you thought you had.
Well he does eventually post the full unedited video. If only major news organizations did that. They never post the full unedited video of interviews or gotcha or the sit down kind.
Reuters used to post unedited video but I don't think they do that anymore. But what exactly do you question from that particular episode? That mulitple ACORN offices in mulitple cities were only too happy to help child sex trafficers?