Just post over at the muche for my political posts. It's hilarious that you are able to fool TPTB so more power to ya!
Just find it and reply to my post on the muche. I'm curious if that one post by itself would make TPTB suspicious, or if they would remain totally clueless. You probably have several log in's you're willing to risk, so go for it!
That's twice you're telling me to post something on the muche! Newsflash! Already am! You just don't know who I am...but you're a lot of fun!
Anyhow, like I said...politika discussions over there are frowned upon. Some new fluffmuch rule, I guess. So I'm trying to restore this place for talk and the new Governor, betteroffhere, will be in charge of his new section soon. Give him a heartfelt welcome!
As far as the letter to the Editor, that's what I love about this section dedicated just to proving you wrongo. The op-eds are published online and in the paper. So you shouldn't have much trouble finding it.
Did you read mine? Here it is:
A message to readers of the N-J Letters to The Editor and Opinions Page:
Freedom of speech is a valued treasure of our country. Our citizens are granted
the right to express their opinion by the Constitution and as such we must all
honor the right of our fellow citizens to do so.
However, I've seen a distinct aura to the N-J Editorial position and many
Letters to the Editor over the past few months that beg questioning.
For example: The recent Op-Ed from one Sam Staley criticizing the high speed
rail efforts of Florida. Mr. Staley uses his credentials as a member of The
Reason Foundation to express a compelling argument against high speed rail.
Taken at face value, one might agree with his position with no further thought.
Yet, let's look a little deeper. The Reason Foundation, a "non-partisan",
non-profit think tank, is far from that. With financial backing from the
nation's leading Libertarians, particularly the Koch brothers; and funding from
Big Oil and the automobile industry as well as CCA it becomes obvious that The
Reason Foundation is far from "non-partisan" and is, in fact, pursuing a
well-planned drive to rid our country of any and all regulation of our most
precious commodity - our environment.
This tone of duplicity is apparent in many of the opinions of the N-J and it's
letter writers. May I suggest to the educated reader one thing? Before you read
and believe everything within the Editorial page; try to investigate the source
of the words and the agenda behind such words before making an intelligent
decision regarding their verity.
Howey D
Frankly I forgot about it, so thanks for posting it. I didn't know it was going to be about the High Speed rail though, although actually it wasn't. You didn't address one issue brought up in their editorial. Typical of liberal responses though. You attack the person or institution. The arguments? Irrelevant.
I do have a theory on who your (or one of your) muche identities is. However if I post it here, you'll just deny it. So I'll just wait and see if you trip up. To avoid that though you will have to limit your posts. You give yourself up in multiple ways when you post frequently.
