Well I would agree in a technical sense we don't have the background or training to give a professional legal opinion. But that kind of goes without saying. You should be able to state your own opinion if you think there are any limits to the commerce clause or not.
My opinion of the commerce clause is irrelevant; although of course I agree with the majority of those who believe, going back to the inception of our country, that it's a two-way street, a view that's been used most often by the courts in interpreting the Clause. That being, the Clause by its own existence strips states of the authority to regulate some ways, but allows them to retain concurrent power to regulate commerce in other ways.
Of course, that would require one to think beyond the black/white box and embrace the gray. You have a problem with that, don't you?
and....is lilmike the polar bear ?
Nah...he's more of a Vincent. All bark and no bite, iykwim.
