I'm actually a little surprised at this.. even tho I thought he was bat-shit, I just didn't expect a court to rule that way..
so now, they'll get him competent with meds and what not.. and then try him.
my question is... if he's to incompetent to stand trial and needs meds in order to be competent, then he wasn't competent when he did the crime so how can he be convicted when he was clearly nuts?
I'm trying to get caught up here...
I'm not surprised he was deemed nuts. Wasn't John Hinkley the same? Sent to a mental hospital until he was able to be tried? Like never?
I'm also not concerned. The guy definitely is nuts. As long as he's locked away, I'll be happy.
