RIF. I'll let you find it.
I'm guessing you are betting that I actually won't go back and try to find "it", and this time you are correct. The down and dirty is that you were dupped by that story, posted it, and are now trying to backtrack and act like you really knew all along that it was a fraudulent story on Scott, because (my theory), you would rather be thought of as lying than being fooled.
In this case, can't both apply? Sheesh, just admit you got dupped. It's no big deal, unlike your insistence that you knew all along Scott wasn't involved and tried to plant a phoney story blaming him for toll booth hijinks.
As far as the Solantic story, maybe I'm missing something, but what is the issue? I'm not following what the crime is.
