What does "brightbart followers" mean to you. Because for instance, I find some things with Huffington Post to be dead on even though aol, part of that conglomerate is a gov lackey. However those items are often nothing more than a reprint from the AP or something like that. For another example, everyone knows that "Christian Science" is out there but the reporting and investigative pieces from Christian Science Monitor are usually outstanding journalism. I tend to make up my mind on the smell test of a news story by item rather than an entire site.
The term "breitbart followers", and the words surrounding it, are mine and are not attributed to the Huffington Post.
In light of recent unfounded allegations of plagiarism, I try not to c/p articles.
