huh,so Obama isn't just "vetoing any legislation that would void Defense cuts" there seems to be more to that statement of yours already.. you wouldn't be trying to make Obama look bad would you?
why did you leave the 'or an equal amount of domestic spending cuts.' off? Why just the emphasis on his vetoing any legislation that would void the defense cuts?
This is why I’m convinced you’ve lost your damn mind. Obama’s actual record is what makes him look bad, and I had nothing to do with it. Your issue is that you’re constantly looking and drilling deep in my posts for places where I might “be trying to make Obama look bad.”
First off, who cares? Why would you be so worried that I might try to make Obama “look bad?” That doesn’t make any sense.
Secondly, you are trying to pretend that I was selectively cutting Obama’s statement to the point of being deceptive. That’s idiotic unless you really had no idea what we were talking about. We were talking about defense cuts .
Memory lane please:
I'm trying to figure out where you got that I was happy with the failure..I figure the defense budget probably needs Obama's increased $ because drones cost more and less money would mean less drones.. and I like drones... altho I'm sure there is money there that could be saved if anyone was willing to find it..
To which I replied:
In many previous comments, the defense budget was the first place you've mentioned that you wanted to cut. Including in the Obama era. So if you are now saying, no, you don't want cuts that big in the defense budget, are you upset that Obama said he would veto any attempt by Congress to fix those cuts?
Now my statement, “are you upset that Obama said he would veto any attempt by Congress to fix those cuts?” was not taken out of context or was being deceptive in any way. That’s exactly the subject we were talking about until you ran off the rails.
OHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh OK, I see.. He's not vetoing any legislation that would void Defense cuts, he's vetoing congresses attempts to get around their debt-reduction job..
see, wow.. it's a good thing I asked or I would have believed Fox news was right and Obama was soft on defense and trying to destroy this country by limiting the defense budget..
whew.. reading really is fundamental..
Reading is fundamental, and so is context. Apparently your abilities in both are seriously degraded since WE WERE TALKING ABOUT DEFENSE CUTS!*
*and this entire thread was about the supercomittee failure that triggers the sequestration cuts.
As I said, conversing with you is joyless now since instead of actually discussing or arguing about the issue, you want to bitch about some inference or implication that you think I made. Obviously no amount of laying out the facts will correct you on this because your feelings on what I wrote are not based on what I actually wrote, they are based on your inner psychobabble dialogue that runs in your head.
Which is why you’ve been crazy the whole time.
