are you medicated? The line of discussion was started by you..you were whing about the recess appointment.. we were talking about the the 'pro-forma' session.. Chuck said it was BS when Reid did it and it's BS now.. but the gOP has really abused it's power by doing it 197 times compared to Reid 16 times..
there would be no need for recess appointment or pro-forma sessions if the GOP didn't abuse their power with all the secret holds on the nominations..
are you ill?
seriously, you're too busy thinking you're being 'obtuse' in one thread and you're missing the 1+1=2 here.. It's hard to believe you've lost the ability to follow more than one line of discussion.. didn't I teach you anything?
umm, that I'm for torturing someone if they have my kid.. or if there is a bomb in the basement and we need to know how to turn it off?
nice try in getting around your hypocrisy... but it's still there.. you are fine with GWB's lawyer telling him he can torture, but let Obama's DOJ tell him he can make a recess appointment and you go all 'that's unconstitutional'...because the weight of Obama's is soooo much more destructive... HA! you're partsian is showing Dear. HA!
btw, you really need a little less drinky-poo when you're reading/replying... you've got a serious PUI issue going on here.. because what I said in those clips you copied, is pretty easy to understand
Those secret holds have nothing to do with the issue of a unconstitutional appointments. Are you honestly arguing that Republican secret holds justify violating the constitution?
That reminds me of Forrest Gump, when Jenny's boyfriend hit her because of that
"lying son of a bitch, Johnson!"So the Republican's forced Obama to violate the constitution. Interesting defense.
By the way, if that was Chuck's intent from his post I totally misread it.
