Ha! This was the "perfectly good conversation" you think I threw a stop stick into.
You turned the conversation around to being only a partisan issue. So that's what I responded to. You quit discussing policy a long time ago, remember?
you're an idiot..
o lookie! now I turned it into a name-calling issue..
go back and look at what the quoted reply was in answer to..
I'll help.
How is this a d/r issue. Romney wrote Obamacare.
tadaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
My answer was relevant and correct.. the GOP
was for mandates up until Obama added it into his healthcare plan..That's not partsian, it's factual... unless?...? what because it's factual
that's what makes it partisan? seriously? I know your party has issues with those pesky facts, but calling someone partsian for using them is a little out there don't you think?
policy? really...? dude, you're so hyper-partisan that you attacked Obama for being a 'cheap-skate' because he didn't give 14% of his income
20 years ago when he was probably still in school and living off of pop-tarts and funions..! until you can get past that kind of crap, you can't possibly contribute anything to a 'policy' conversation..
it's just like this conversation, did you reply with a counter to what I was saying about the GOP and their invention of the "mandate"..? Did you bring in anything on policy? anything on why the mandate was a bad idea? any research on that issue that could have been starting point? Nope,you just went with a 'flip-flopper' jab....
ooo, wow.. such a substantive conversation...very 'high-brow' of you! thanks pot!
but hey look on the bright side, you stopped another conversation from going any further... YA! You won! you diverted attention away from the GOP's party of No, Obama-insanity...
