It also doesn't give 'cost of living' -like raises to the amounts of the voucher.. meaning, as insurance costs rise, the rich will still be able to supplement the gov't voucher with their personal funds, where as the poor will not.. so they will get less and less coverage.
the irony here is this plan also looks a whole lot like it should be called "Obamacare for the elderly" with it's vouchers and market-place of private insurance to chose from.. it just doesn't have the safety nets Obamacare has to make it a good plan..
I still find it amazing that even in a south American rainforest, .they have universal health care
Iraq and Afghanistan, have uni healthcare that we pay for..
.. us? not so much..
It actually seems very close to Obamacare. Or sort of a cross between Obamacare and Medicare part D.
