For someone who gets his rocks off using words like maybe, perhaps, if, et al while livong in a black and white world where those words don't even exist, I guess it's no surprise he doesn't get the meaning of "if".
what bothers me is, he's not a dumb guy. He knows the difference in what he's saying, but pretends like he's saying the same thing that's in the article.. it's like saying
"The wind blew across the field" is the same as
"The wind blew across the field, killing 7 small children".. both sentences have pretty much the same words, but 2 totally different meanings..
saying
Obama said he would veto any attempt by Congress to fix those(defense) cuts is erroneous, one.. and dishonest two. Because it's leaving off the whole rest of the sentence that changes the meaning of what is being said..
I guess that's the game and goal though.. Make Obama the bad guy at any and all turns even if you have to photoshop to do it..
again, this is not the same as the Left coming after Bush for (example)wire-tapping.. that was real, this? Isn't. Why can't they come after him for something real? Why the need to make shit up all the time? Hell come after him for vetoing the sequester 'get-around' because it's going to trigger a defense cut if Congress can't find cuts... but come after him with the
entire sentence and it's meaning and not just change it all up to make it look more than what it is..
